<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Integrated Realities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.integratedrealities.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.integratedrealities.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:16:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Facial Scanning by The Strong, Weak, Open, and Transparent &#171; Augmentation</title>
		<link>http://blog.integratedrealities.com/?p=53#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strong, Weak, Open, and Transparent &#171; Augmentation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augmentation.wordpress.com/?p=53#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] Reality world have progressed rapidly, if not as rapidly as I might once have imagined it would. In one of my  first posts, I closed with an idea about streaming one’s first-person POV to a giant Microsoft Photosynth [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reality world have progressed rapidly, if not as rapidly as I might once have imagined it would. In one of my  first posts, I closed with an idea about streaming one’s first-person POV to a giant Microsoft Photosynth [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zerkin Glove! by TEDxMidTownNY Event Slated for March 8th</title>
		<link>http://blog.integratedrealities.com/?p=157#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>TEDxMidTownNY Event Slated for March 8th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augmentation.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] is also the inventor and developer of the Zerkin Glove, a low cost glove for interacting with virtual objects in an augmented environment, and the author [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is also the inventor and developer of the Zerkin Glove, a low cost glove for interacting with virtual objects in an augmented environment, and the author [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Conversation With Paul Travers of Vuzix by Chris Grayson</title>
		<link>http://blog.integratedrealities.com/?p=180#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Grayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augmentation.wordpress.com/?p=180#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Noah,

As I&#039;m sure you&#039;re aware, they carry Vuzix over at DataVision, (corner of 5th Ave. &amp; 39th).

http://www.datavis.com

They always have demo models out on display, as I&#039;m sure they will when the Wrap 920 is released. I will try them out there, and consider buying a pair.

I thank you for running this piece as it clarified some misunderstandings I had about the AV920 Wrap vs the 920 Wrap. Clearly there is confusion about the products, as Paul realizes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noah,</p>
<p>As I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re aware, they carry Vuzix over at DataVision, (corner of 5th Ave. &amp; 39th).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.datavis.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.datavis.com</a></p>
<p>They always have demo models out on display, as I&#8217;m sure they will when the Wrap 920 is released. I will try them out there, and consider buying a pair.</p>
<p>I thank you for running this piece as it clarified some misunderstandings I had about the AV920 Wrap vs the 920 Wrap. Clearly there is confusion about the products, as Paul realizes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ISMAR&#8230; Where to start&#8230; by ISMAR 2009: An Augmented Reality &#8220;Top Chef&#8221; Coopetition&#160;&#124;&#160;UgoTrade</title>
		<link>http://blog.integratedrealities.com/?p=193#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>ISMAR 2009: An Augmented Reality &#8220;Top Chef&#8221; Coopetition&#160;&#124;&#160;UgoTrade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augmentation.wordpress.com/?p=193#comment-69</guid>
		<description>[...] the demo rooms, Noah Zerkin (pic below left) pretty much single handedly carried the AR flag for a growing community of [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the demo rooms, Noah Zerkin (pic below left) pretty much single handedly carried the AR flag for a growing community of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on See-Through HMD for Consumers Further Off Than Expected by Joe Ludwig</title>
		<link>http://blog.integratedrealities.com/?p=172#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ludwig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augmentation.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Same here. I feel much better about what the next two years will hold for HMDs. The companies that are charging academics five and six figures for crappy displays are going to get a serious wake-up call.

I just wish it were happening NOW NOW NOW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here. I feel much better about what the next two years will hold for HMDs. The companies that are charging academics five and six figures for crappy displays are going to get a serious wake-up call.</p>
<p>I just wish it were happening NOW NOW NOW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Conversation With Paul Travers of Vuzix by bzerk</title>
		<link>http://blog.integratedrealities.com/?p=180#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>bzerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augmentation.wordpress.com/?p=180#comment-67</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s fair. You&#039;re entitled to your opinion. I obviously felt led on, too, but Paul apologized, and I think it was an honest mistake. They weren&#039;t ready to show their new design, and they didn&#039;t take the original down. As for the so-called &quot;quantum optics,&quot; I never took that name for anything other than a branding gimick. All that said, Paul showed me something at ISMAR that, while not unique, proved to me that they are working in the right direction with their optical see-through display development, and that they aren&#039;t dawdling about it.

Lastly, in the interest of full disclosure, I should add that Vuzix has since sent me a CamAR unit to evaluate and use in my own experiments with the VR920s that I purchased some time ago. This won&#039;t stop me from voicing any criticisms of their products though, and judging from the Wrap unit that I tried on briefly at ISMAR, I will have criticisms. Still, it&#039;s a step in the right direction, and I know first-hand that Vuzix has some promising tech in the works, and is working harder than any of the other firms to get great head-worn display units into the hands of consumers. For that, I give them a lot of credit. They want to give us what we want, and they are working hard to be able to do so. I&#039;m not out to crucify the best prospect we&#039;ve got for the time being, especially after they&#039;ve honestly acknowledged their mistake, and I think learned something from being called out on it. In the meantime, when the Wrap 920 ships, I will buy or borrow a pair, and I&#039;ll tell you honestly what I think of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s fair. You&#8217;re entitled to your opinion. I obviously felt led on, too, but Paul apologized, and I think it was an honest mistake. They weren&#8217;t ready to show their new design, and they didn&#8217;t take the original down. As for the so-called &#8220;quantum optics,&#8221; I never took that name for anything other than a branding gimick. All that said, Paul showed me something at ISMAR that, while not unique, proved to me that they are working in the right direction with their optical see-through display development, and that they aren&#8217;t dawdling about it.</p>
<p>Lastly, in the interest of full disclosure, I should add that Vuzix has since sent me a CamAR unit to evaluate and use in my own experiments with the VR920s that I purchased some time ago. This won&#8217;t stop me from voicing any criticisms of their products though, and judging from the Wrap unit that I tried on briefly at ISMAR, I will have criticisms. Still, it&#8217;s a step in the right direction, and I know first-hand that Vuzix has some promising tech in the works, and is working harder than any of the other firms to get great head-worn display units into the hands of consumers. For that, I give them a lot of credit. They want to give us what we want, and they are working hard to be able to do so. I&#8217;m not out to crucify the best prospect we&#8217;ve got for the time being, especially after they&#8217;ve honestly acknowledged their mistake, and I think learned something from being called out on it. In the meantime, when the Wrap 920 ships, I will buy or borrow a pair, and I&#8217;ll tell you honestly what I think of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on See-Through HMD for Consumers Further Off Than Expected by Robert Rice</title>
		<link>http://blog.integratedrealities.com/?p=172#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 04:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augmentation.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Apple can stuff it.

Anyway, I met with Paul Travers at ISMAR 09 and I think they are getting back on track. I&#039;d like to withdraw my previous comments about a big fail here. 

I&#039;m giving Vuzix a tentative thumbsup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple can stuff it.</p>
<p>Anyway, I met with Paul Travers at ISMAR 09 and I think they are getting back on track. I&#8217;d like to withdraw my previous comments about a big fail here. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m giving Vuzix a tentative thumbsup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Conversation With Paul Travers of Vuzix by Robert Rice</title>
		<link>http://blog.integratedrealities.com/?p=180#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 04:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augmentation.wordpress.com/?p=180#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Nah, just being honest. I&#039;ve met Paul in person several times, and I&#039;ve had hands-on experiences with the various wearables. I also met Paul at ISMAR 09 this past week. Vuzix is definitely back on the ball, and the de facto leader in the commercial/consumer space. The other companies have great technology too, but far behind Vuzix in terms of bringing that tech to the market.

I expect to see some killer announcements from Vuzix over the next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, just being honest. I&#8217;ve met Paul in person several times, and I&#8217;ve had hands-on experiences with the various wearables. I also met Paul at ISMAR 09 this past week. Vuzix is definitely back on the ball, and the de facto leader in the commercial/consumer space. The other companies have great technology too, but far behind Vuzix in terms of bringing that tech to the market.</p>
<p>I expect to see some killer announcements from Vuzix over the next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Conversation With Paul Travers of Vuzix by ron</title>
		<link>http://blog.integratedrealities.com/?p=180#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 01:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augmentation.wordpress.com/?p=180#comment-65</guid>
		<description>I think you are being especially nice to Travers having led on the augmented reality about quantum optics for soo long.. I&#039;m actually quite annoyed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are being especially nice to Travers having led on the augmented reality about quantum optics for soo long.. I&#8217;m actually quite annoyed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on See-Through HMD for Consumers Further Off Than Expected by Chris Grayson</title>
		<link>http://blog.integratedrealities.com/?p=172#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Grayson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://augmentation.wordpress.com/?p=172#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I covered some of this territory in a recent article, &quot;Eye for an iPhone&quot;, and I now must write a follow-up. I will link to this article. Nice to get new information (even if it&#039;s disappointing information).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I covered some of this territory in a recent article, &#8220;Eye for an iPhone&#8221;, and I now must write a follow-up. I will link to this article. Nice to get new information (even if it&#8217;s disappointing information).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

